Trial reportScientific reports2025
Randomized double-blind crossover trial of a transdermal maltose dissolvable microneedle patch for topical anesthesia before intravenous cannulation for thalassemia children.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrogel microneedles functioning in pathological surroundings: where soft materials overcome hard scars.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of transdermal dissolvable microneedle array patch (MNAP) in enhancing topical anesthesia delivery was studied in transfusion-dependent thalassemia children who had intravenous cannulation (IVC) for blood transfusion. We also compared the use of skin conductance algesimeter index (SCAI) as a pain assessment tool against the visual analog score (VAS) in these children with ages between 6 and 17 years, who had the topical anesthetic cream (EMLA) applied on the hand dorsum before IVC. This was a double-blind, randomized crossover trial involving 19 children with each child randomized to four intervention arms sequentially: MNAP and 1 finger-tip-unit (FTU) EMLA applied for 30 min (A), MNAP and 0.5 FTU EMLA for 30 min (B); MNAP and 1 FTU EMLA for 15 min (C); and no MNAP (sham) patch and 1FTU EMLA for 30 min (D), before IVC. The primary and secondary endpoints were, respectively, VAS and SCAI scores measured immediately after IVC. The MNAP with 1 FTU EMLA for 30 min resulted in significantly lower VAS scores than sham patch [MeanMNAP (SE),1.839 (0.560) vs. [Meansham (SE): 3.063 (0.534); p = 0.048], but not SCAI [MeanMNAP (SE): 0.200 (0.024) versus Meansham (SE): 0.203 (0.026); p = 0.926]. The SCAI was not significantly correlated with VAS for all groups (r = -0.040 to 0.378; p (all) > 0.05). Only 1 participant reported pruritus as a mild adverse event. The MNAP is a safe adjunct method to enhance effectiveness of pain relief from EMLA skin anesthetic before IVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.