Trial reportScientific reports2025
Preparatory use of neurodynamics to enhance upper limb function in patients with acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04652934 (Effectiveness of the Neural Mobilization on Upper Limb Functionality in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of the Neural Mobilization on Upper Limb Functionality in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury: Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Centric, Single-Blind Clinical Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Effects of Femoral Nerve Neurodynamic Techniques and Static Stretching on Quadriceps Muscle Mechanical Properties.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies on neurodynamics have shown beneficial effects on the musculoskeletal system and peripheral nerve physiology. Hence, the application of neurodynamics in people who have suffered an acquired brain injury has the potential to improve their functionality to perform daily activities. This study aimed to assess the immediate effects of a single session of median nerve neurodynamics versus a placebo intervention on the affected upper limb (UL) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). A single-blind randomised clinical trial was conducted with 24 participants, divided into an experimental group (n = 12) and a control group (n = 12. Outcomes measures included grip strength (dynamometer), spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale), pain (algometer and Visual Analogue Scale), range of motion (goniometer), and surface electromyography. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the experimental group in terms of reduced spasticity in the triceps and carpal flexors, and increased wrist flexion and extension range of motion. Additionally, modulation of muscle activity was detected in the triceps, biceps, and wrist flexors and extensors. In contrast, changes in grip strength and pain perception were not statistically significant. Although a downward trend in grip strength was noted in both groups, this observation should be interpreted cautiously and does not imply a therapeutic benefit without further functional corroboration. These findings suggest that neurodynamics may produce short-term neuromuscular effects in ABI patients, particularly in muscle tone and joint mobility. However, further research is needed to determine the clinical relevance and sustainability of these effects.Clinical trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04652934). Date of first trial registration 03/12/2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.