ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced model inversion via frequency disentanglement and latent space optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Model inversion attacks, which aim to reconstruct private training images from a target model's outputs, highlight the privacy risks in artificial intelligence systems. Existing methods, relying on generative adversarial networks, face challenges such as frequency-feature coupling, random latent-space sampling with initial points distant from the target identity, and insufficient loss functions for optimizing difficult samples. To address these, this paper proposes three core innovations: frequency decoupling, Top-K initialization, and dynamic focus boundary loss. Specifically, learnable filters disentangle and fuse features at multiple scales, achieving fine-grained frequency decomposition. Top-K initialization retains the best latent codes for each identity, constructing precise latent vectors. The dynamic focus boundary loss, inspired by focal loss, prevents overfitting to easy samples and focuses on difficult ones. Experiments on CelebA, FFHQ, and FaceScrub datasets demonstrate that our method significantly enhances attack performance, especially under large data-distribution shifts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.