ArticleScientific reports2025
Monitoring wheat leaf rust severity using machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wheat leaf rust, caused by Puccinia triticina Eriks., is recognized as one of the most destructive diseases affecting wheat worldwide, including Iran, resulting in substantial losses in grain yield and quality. This research focused on evaluating the pathogenic factors of nine leaf rust isolates collected from four different climates in Iran, using various differential genotypes. The assessment of leaf rust infection types was conducted on 49 durum and bread wheat genotypes, including susceptible control genotypes and 55 differential genotypes at the seedling stages. The results revealed a significant difference among wheat genotypes in their response to all isolates (p ≤ 0.01). Notably, certain genotypes, such as the Italian landrace (P.S. No4), Shabrang, Chamran2, Mehregan, Shosh, and Gonbad, exhibited resistance to all isolates at the seedling stage, indicating the presence of seedling resistance genes. Additionally, we determined the virulence/avirulence patterns for various resistance genes in the differential genotypes by assessing their responses to different isolates and recording the infection types. The findings indicated that all isolates were virulent on the lines carrying the Lr34 and Lr37 genes, whereas none of the isolates displayed a virulence on the lines carrying the Lr19 gene. This research provides valuable insights into the resistance patterns of wheat genotypes against leaf rust isolates in different climates in Iran, contributing to our understanding of the genetic basis of resistance and aiding in the development of effective strategies for disease management in wheat cultivation. The XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting) algorithm generated the most accurate predictions for the variables thousand grain weight and grain yield, while the MARS (multivariate adaptive regression spline) algorithm generated the most accurate predictions for the variables spike weight, number of grains per spike, and grain weight per spike. For each of these variables, GP (Gaussian process), MARS, and XGBoost achieved the lowest RMSE (root mean square error) values, indicating minimal prediction errors, and the highest R² values, signifying a strong correlation between the predicted and observed data. These prediction performances highlighted the robustness and accuracy of the GP, MARS and XGBoost algorithms in modeling wheat disease severity and its effects on yield outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.