ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-strategy secretary bird optimization algorithm for UAV path planning in complex environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a UAV path planning method based on a Multi-strategy Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm (MSBOA) to address the challenges of navigating complex terrain. First, a pooling mechanism is introduced to enhance population diversity and improve the algorithm's optimization capabilities, balancing global exploration and local exploitation. Second, a dynamic fitness distance balance technique is incorporated to balance exploration and exploitation, preventing the population from becoming trapped in local optima while improving convergence accuracy. Finally, a greedy selection-based centroid reverse learning approach is used to update the population, enhancing the algorithm's exploratory performance. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed improved algorithm, the proposed MSBOA is compared with classical and advanced intelligent algorithms by solving the CEC2017 benchmark test functions and a designed UAV environment model. Comparative analysis of simulation results indicates that the proposed MSBOA converges faster and achieves higher accuracy than the traditional SBOA. It effectively handles complex UAV path planning problems, enabling the design of faster, shorter and safer flight paths. This further demonstrates the excellent performance of the multi-strategy SBOA in UAV path planning, highlighting its broad application prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.