Trial reportScientific reports2025
The effect of prone position on oxygen saturation, blood gas parameters, and respiratory rate in intensive care patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06997666 (The Effect of Prone Position on Oxygen Saturation, Blood Gas Parameters, and Respiratory Rate in Intensive Care Patients With COVID-19-induced ARDS), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Prone Position on Oxygen Saturation, Blood Gas Parameters, and Respiratory Rate in Intensive Care Patients With COVID-19-induced ARDS
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effect of prone positioning on oxygen saturation, arterial blood gas parameters, and respiratory rate in intensive care patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This randomized experimental study used a six-measure time series design with control and intervention groups. A total of 90 intubated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and ARDS were enrolled, with 45 patients in the experimental group and 45 in the control group. The experimental group received a 30-minute prone positioning session, while no intervention was applied to the control group. Data were collected using a Demographic Information Form and a structured form to record oxygen saturation, blood gas parameters, and respiratory rate. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06997666; first posted on 28/05/2025). Age and gender were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Patients in the experimental group demonstrated higher mean values of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂), and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂), along with lower PaCO₂ and respiratory rates. No significant changes were observed in sodium or lactate levels. All effects observed were immediate and short-term. No adverse events or unintended effects were reported. A single short-duration session of prone positioning resulted in immediate physiological improvements in oxygenation, ventilation parameters, and respiratory rate in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Further studies are needed to assess long-term clinical outcomes and sustained benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.