ArticleScientific reports2025
Microstructural, mechanical and statistical evaluation of concrete incorporating waste glass wool exposed to elevated temperatures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concretes Modified with Insulation Wool Recovered from Recycled Heating Pipes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ANOVA-RSM Analysis for Predicting and Optimizing the Mechanical Response of Concrete Incorporating Waste Brick Aggregates After Elevated Temperatures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning based optimization of strength, durability, and carbon efficiency of fly ash-GGBS geopolymer concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to determine the effects of using waste glass wool in concrete's on the concrete's mechanical properties. Samples of concrete containing varying percentages of waste glass wool by total concrete volume (0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%) were tested after exposure to a range of temperatures: 24 °C, 400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C. Several tests, including compressive strength (CS), splitting tensile strength (STS), and flexural strength (FS), were then performed on the samples in the laboratory following the completion of elevated temperature. The results showed that glass wool waste material reduces the concrete CS. Conversely, experiments have shown that samples STS and FS, increase proportionally with the amount of waste glass wool. Accordingly, the concrete compressive strength decreased by 4.26%, 7.84%, 11.87%, 14.24%, and 17.27% when the mixing ratio was increased from 1% to 5%. On the other hand, by increasing the mixing ratio from 1% to 5%, concrete STS and FS were enhanced by 9.61%; 15.19%; 27.70%; 36.58%; and 60.41% and 16.91%; 29.99%; 35.73%; 45.45%; and 59.45%, respectively. FE-SEM and EDX analysis was also included. Furthermore, equations were developed to estimate the capacities of concrete, with waste glass wool, after exposure to elevated temperatures. Taguchi analysis revealed that temperature is the most critical factor affecting mechanical performance, while the addition of waste glass wool contributed to strength retention at elevated temperatures. ANOVA confirmed the statistical significance of both temperature and waste glass wool's contribution, reinforcing their combined role in producing sustainable concrete with improved high-temperature resistance. The addition of waste glass wool to concrete recycles waste glass wool and minimizes the need for new raw materials and waste disposal requirements. According to the ratio and distribution above, adding modest quantities of glass wool may lighten concrete without affecting its strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.