ArticleScientific reports2025
Insight of the seed germination of Lily species under different chemical treatments and light conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lily seeds are commonly used for commercial production and genetic breeding, and their germination rates under different light conditions can be improved by chemical treatments. However, there is a lack of research to systematically screen the pre-treatment methods that are most suitable for various lily species. The study selected six lily species (Lilium pumilum DC., Lilium davidii var. unicolor, Lilium auratum var. platyphyllum, Lilium lancifolium Thunb., Lilium distichum Nakai, and Lilium pensylvanicum Ker Gawl.) and employed a randomized complete block three-factor factorial design, with three factors being species, chemical treatments (0.1% KNO₃, 0.1% K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.