ArticleScientific reports2025
Chemometric-assisted spectrophotometric approach for stability assessment of safinamide and its synthetic precursor in antiparkinsonian formulation with sustainability profiling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a significant health issue that affects older individuals. Safinamide mesylate (SAF) is a recently developed adjunct therapy increasingly employed in the management of PD. Ensuring the stability of new drug formulations and establishing suitable stability-indicating methodologies is crucial for pharmaceutical analysis. The current study has developed three new, user-friendly, and robust mathematical methods using multivariate spectrophotometric analysis to quantify SAF, its synthetic precursor impurity (4-HBD), and stress-induced degradation products. The multivariate algorithms used include principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), and synergy intervals partial least squares (siPLS). The ranges of the proposed methods were 3.00-23.00, 1.00-5.00, 2.50-6.50, and 5.00-13.00 µg/mL for SAF, 4-HBD, SAF hydrolytic degradation products, and SAF oxidative degradation products, respectively. When analyzed using the applied methods, the commercially available tablet preparation showed stability with no impurities or interference from tablet additives. In terms of accuracy and precision, the statistical analysis also revealed no significant differences in comparison to the reported methods. The developed multivariate models were validated using internal and external validation sets. The results demonstrated that the siPLS model outperformed PCR and PLS based on the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and the correlation coefficient values (r). Furthermore, these methods can be used as a substitute for HPLC in quality control laboratories when multiple samples need to be analyzed within a short timeframe. Finally, various sustainability assessment tools were utilized to evaluate and measure the environmental background of the established methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.