Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318577›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

Characterizing 'Atmosphere': exploring determinants of regular service attendance amongst integrated supervised consumption site clients in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.

Benjamin D Scher, Benjamin W Chrisinger, David K Humphreys, Gillian W Shorter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin D ScherDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-0238
Benjamin W ChrisingerDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7934-9680
David K HumphreysDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7761-5746
Gillian W ShorterSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. g.shorter@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-2297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has explored barriers and facilitators to supervised consumption sites (SCS) in Canadian settings. Despite this, little is known about what factors drive individuals to initiate and repeatedly attend specific SCS where multiple SCS options are available, such as in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES). The aim of this study was to understand the structural, contextual, and operational determinants of regular SCS attendance during Canada's ongoing overdose crisis.

methodsRapid-ethnographic fieldwork was conducted over a six-week period at an integrated SCS in Vancouver's DTES. This comprised an initial five-week period of non-participant observation (≈200 h) followed by a community consultation regarding the research design and question protocols. Qualitative data were then collected through five focus groups (n = 25) and 20 semi-structured interviews with regular service attendees with data analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsOur findings highlight four important factors related to regular service attendance. The service had a regular clientele who described their attendance as routinized, which they attributed to four distinct factors: (1) the accessible location, (2) the on-site auxiliary health and support services, (3) the diversity of harm reduction provision, and (4) the atmosphere. Exploring the concept of atmosphere in more depth showed that it was characterized by the safety, familiarity, and inclusivity experienced within the service. Together, these factors facilitated a strong sense of belonging among attendees regarding the service and its community of staff and clients.

conclusionWithin the context of an ongoing overdose crisis, our findings highlight SCS service characteristics which facilitate routinized engagement including accessibility, wrap-around support, comprehensive and tailored harm reduction, and an inclusive welcoming atmosphere. These insights can inform policy makers and service providers in scaling and developing effective, client-centred SCSs to reduce harm and promote wellbeing.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseNeedle-Exchange ProgramsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAnthropology, CulturalBritish ColumbiaFemaleFocus GroupsHarm ReductionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41318577
PMCPMC12771731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.