ArticleReproductive health2025
Fetal rights from Islamic and contemporary legal perspectives: a scoping review.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe absence of a comprehensive legal framework regarding fetal rights may lead to negative consequences, including an increase in intentional abortions, unnecessary medical interventions in childbirth, and neglect of fetal health. This study aims to identify fetal rights in Iran and globally in order to contribute to the development of a national fetal rights charter.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework. A systematic search was performed in domestic and international databases, including IranMedex, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords. After screening, 24 studies were selected for final analysis. Data were analyzed with MAXQDA software, applying Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis.
findingsA total of 59 fetal rights were identified and categorized into three domains: medical, ethical, and economic. Medical rights included the right to life, health, growth, nutrition, and protection from external harm. Ethical rights encompassed dignity, identity, respect, and the balance between maternal and fetal rights. Economic rights included inheritance and maintenance.
conclusionThis scoping review identified 59 fetal rights across medical, ethical, and economic domains. Respecting these rights is essential to reduce unnecessary medical interventions and protect both fetal and maternal health. Developing a comprehensive fetal rights charter in Iran could harmonize legal, medical, and ethical perspectives and strengthen maternal and child healthcare policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.