ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Physical performance predictors in youth breaststroke swimming: motor and biomotor diagnostic differences.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Swimming performance in youth athletes is influenced by a complex interplay of physical, motor, and physiological factors. Among competitive swimming strokes, breaststroke is technically demanding and requires precise coordination, balance, and strength. Understanding which specific motor and biomotor components most strongly predict performance in young swimmers can help coaches and sports scientists design more targeted training and talent identification programs. This study aimed to investigate whether statistically significant differ-ences exist in motor and biomotor characteristics between child swimmers with high and low performance levels in breaststroke swimming. A comparative cross-sectional study design was employed. The sample consisted of 58 child swimmers (age: 11.55 ± 1.35) who regularly participated in swimming training. Based on their 50-meter breaststroke times, participants were divided into high- and low-performance groups. Motor and biomotor performance levels were assessed using variables such as reaction time, balance, flexibility, agility, hand grip strength, vertical jump height, and 30-meter sprint time. Arm span was also measured as an anthropo-metric parameter, and intergroup comparisons were conducted accordingly. The findings revealed that higher-performing swimmers exhibited statistically signifi-cant differences in certain motor and biomotor traits compared to their low-er-performing peers. Specifically, agility, vertical jump height, balance, and arm span emerged as potential performance determinants closely aligned with the technical re-quirements of breaststroke swimming. These results suggest that specific motor and biomotor parameters particularly agility, vertical jump, balance, and arm span are key discriminators of breaststroke performance. Therefore, training pro-grams should be designed to enhance neuromuscular coordination, reactive strength, and postural control. Additionally, anthropometric factors such as arm span should be considered in talent identification processes. Targeted development of these attributes may contribute to performance optimization in young swimmers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.