ReviewJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025
Burnout, anxiety and depression in secondary school teachers in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic scoping review & perspective of preventive occupational medicine.
Review in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic added another layer of burden to what is already a demanding occupation; namely, secondary school teacher.
objectiveTo review the published literature concerning burnout, anxiety, and depression in secondary school teachers in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic and to discuss the findings from the perspective of preventive occupational medicine.
methodsA systematic scoping review using the Medline and Web of Science databases with narrative synthesis of findings.
resultsWe identified 16 articles from seven European countries (Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy, Germany, Greece, Spain, Portugal) though results from one study were uninterpretable. Of the 15 remaining, seven assessed burnout or emotional exhaustion, seven assessed anxiety, and seven assessed depression (there was overlap). Only two studies were longitudinal and they focussed on burnout; the remaining 13 were cross-sectional in design. Questionnaires were used to assess severity scores. Mean severity scores for all outcomes appear to fluctuate across the pandemic, but are always high. Loss-to-follow up – indicated in the longitudinal studies – could mean a healthy worker effect (e.g. workers who fall ill and drop out of the study) biases both severity scores per se and their associations with other factors toward null in studies. Differences in- and associations with- outcome scores are reported for sex, age, job experience, cognitive-, personality-, and emotional intelligence-associated factors (e.g. extraversion, presenteeism, openness, resilience, clarity, repair), work-related factors (e.g. student issues, professional support, technology), and COVID-19 associated factors (e.g. family member vulnerability). There are differences in some findings across studies. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic presented a unique situation in which to study factors that contribute to -or provide protection against- burnout, anxiety, and depression. Female teachers may be a higher-risk group for depression. Potential factors that could be modified to mitigate outcomes, albeit identified as associating factors from mostly cross-sectional studies, include emotional intelligence training at the individual level and professional support at a systems level. Given the importance of the teaching profession and the high demands placed on teachers, future studies should consider interventions on such modifiable factors toward reducing health burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.