SynthesisBMC health services research2025
A conceptual framework and umbrella review of digital health technology interventions and health equity.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Structural biases in digital health intervention and health equity research: a bibliometric knowledge graph analysis (2015-2025).Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia Delivered Within a Crenotherapy Setting: Results from a Multicentre Proof-of-Concept Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence on digital health interventions is rapidly emerging, but how health equity is being addressed remains uncertain. This study presents a conceptual framework that identifies causal pathways linking digital health and health equity, serving as an intervention logic model onto which existing and future evidence can be mapped. As an application of this framework, we conduct an umbrella review to map and narratively summarize published systematic reviews on the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of digital health technology interventions. Systematic reviews were searched in electronic databases from 2005 until March 4, 2025, with a focus on chronic disease. Information on study characteristics, digital health technologies, and health equity considerations was extracted. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Thirty-five studies met the eligibility criteria. The most prevalent intervention group was telemedicine, while clinical decision support systems were not the focus of any of the included studies. The systematic reviews varied markedly in quality, with most being equity-focused and addressing more than one dimension of horizontal inequality. Extending the mapping of existing research using the developed framework to other pathways-between digital health, health behaviours, and health outcomes-will help to better inform the design of interventions aimed at addressing the digital divide. Future studies should conduct equity-focused meta-analyses for specific interventions, health outcomes, and decision-making contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.