Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318474›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection at a referral children's hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, 2018-2022.

Jombo Namushi, Hafsah Tootla, James Nuttall, Brian Eley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jombo NamushiPaediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa and Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. jnamushi@gmail.com.
Hafsah TootlaDivision of Medical Microbiology, National Health Laboratory Service, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
James NuttallPaediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa and Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Brian EleyPaediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa and Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the absence of a vaccine, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Studies describing S. aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) in children in Africa remain few.

methodsThis was a retrospective descriptive study conducted at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital (RCWMCH) in Cape Town, South Africa. All S. aureus positive blood culture results for the period 2018-2022 on the National Health Laboratory Service microbiology database were identified. Case records of participants with S. aureus positive blood cultures were retrieved. Demographic, clinical, antimicrobial management and participant outcome data were extracted from the case records. Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges as appropriate. Parametric (Student t-test) and non-parametric (Wilcoxon rank sum test for independent variables) methods were used to compare continuous variables. Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. RStudio statistical computing software version 4.4.2 was used for the logistic regression analysis. Our findings were also compared with a similar study at our institution which analysed the epidemiology of Staphylococcus bloodstream infections between 2007 and 2011 (Naidoo et al. PLoS ONE 8(10):e78396, 2013).

resultsDuring the 5-year study period there were 245 S. aureus BSIs identified, with an overall annual incidence risk of 2.7 cases per 1000 admissions. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) caused 10% of the BSIs and was predominantly healthcare-associated (79.2%). Only 2.1% of participants were living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, underweight was present in 29.2% of children with S. aureus BSI. Healthcare-associated infection comprised 33.3% of all S. aureus BSIs. 70% of BSIs had an identifiable site of infection with skin and soft tissue (25%) being the commonest. All MRSA isolates were susceptible to linezolid, teicoplanin, tigecycline and vancomycin. The mortality rate within 28 days of S. aureus BSI diagnosis was 8.3%. The commonest attributable cause of death was septic shock (25%). Requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission during a BSI, (adjusted Odds ratio (aOR): 5.4, 95% CI: 1.89-15.21) was associated with increased 28-day mortality rate. When compared to the 2007-2011 study, there has been a decline in the incidence risk of S. aureus BSI and the prevalence of healthcare-associated MRSA BSI.

conclusionsS. aureus BSI remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Admission to ICU during a BSI episode was significantly associated with 28-day mortality. Furthermore, over time changes to the epidemiology of S. aureus BSI have occurred at RCWMCH. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable (study is not a clinical trial).

Indexed as

BacteremiaStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAdolescentsBloodstream infectionChildrenStaphylococcus aureusSub-Saharan africa

Identifiers

PMID41318474
PMCPMC12771707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.