ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Targeting distinct amino acid metabolic vulnerabilities in IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype gliomas.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lower grade gliomas frequently harbor mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), which define biologically distinct tumor subtypes. Although IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype gliomas share similar histological morphology, they display markedly different metabolic profiles that may be exploited for targeted therapy. In this study, we investigated therapeutic approaches tailored to these metabolic differences. Using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry, we compared the metabolomes of engineered IDH-wildtype and IDH-mutant glioma cell models. IDH-mutant cells exhibited elevated asparagine levels and reduced glutamine and glutamate levels compared with IDH-wildtype cells. These differences were corroborated in vivo by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of 130 patients with diffuse gliomas, showing lower glutamine and glutamate in IDH-mutant tumors. Pharmacological depletion of asparagine with L-asparaginase, which converts asparagine to aspartate, preferentially inhibited the growth of IDH-wildtype glioma cells, and this effect was potentiated by inhibition of asparagine synthetase. In contrast, inhibition of glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GLUD1), the enzyme catalyzing the conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate, selectively suppressed proliferation of IDH-mutant glioma cells by inducing reactive oxygen species accumulation and apoptosis. In vivo, L-asparaginase suppressed tumor growth in xenografted IDH-wildtype gliomas, whereas GLUD1 inhibition significantly reduced tumor growth in IDH-mutant glioma xenografts. These findings reveal distinct amino acid metabolic vulnerabilities defined by IDH mutation status and identify L-asparaginase and GLUD1 inhibition (via R162) as promising, mutation-specific therapeutic strategies. L-asparaginase demonstrated potent antitumor activity against IDH-wildtype gliomas, while GLUD1 inhibition selectively suppressed IDH-mutant gliomas both in vitro and in vivo. These results highlight the clinical potential of targeting amino acid metabolism in gliomas and provide a strong rationale for translating these mutation-specific approaches into future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.