Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41318359›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Overcoming barriers to build partnerships for managing plant invasions under global change.

Jennifer L Bufford, Angela J Brandt, Kwek Yan Chong, Anna Hooper, Katie L Kamelamela, Christy Martin, Ingrid M Parker, Aníbal Pauchard, Katharine N Suding, Duane A Peltzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Overcoming barriers to build partnerships for managing plant invasions under global change.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer L BuffordManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3320-6024
Angela J BrandtManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5980-9128
Kwek Yan ChongSingapore Botanic Gardens, National Parks Board, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-8957
Anna HooperOffice of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand.
Katie L KamelamelaSchool of Ocean Futures, Global Discovery and Conservation Science Center, Arizona State University, Hilo, Hawaii, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-4454
Christy MartinCoordinating Group on Alien Pest Species, Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Ingrid M ParkerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-1827
Aníbal PauchardLaboratorio de Invasiones Biológicas (LIB), Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1284-3163
Katharine N SudingDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5357-0176
Duane A PeltzerManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-3738

Funding

New Zealand's Biological Heritage National Science Challenge Ngā Koiora Tuku Iho
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-native plant invasions are a cross-boundary conservation challenge, requiring coordinated management and policy responses underpinned by science. Global change is expected to exacerbate this challenge by changing abiotic and biotic drivers of invasive plant distribution, abundance, and impact. Current approaches may no longer be effective, and management must adapt to new threats and conditions. Collaborative personal and institutional partnerships are crucial to link research to practice and policy in order to better manage the complex drivers of invasions and mitigate their impacts under ongoing global change. We used examples from local to global scales to demonstrate how reciprocal knowledge exchange and project codesign among researchers, practitioners, and policy makers can improve conservation outcomes and benefits from invasive species management. Researchers provide expertise needed to apply concepts to new contexts, practitioners hold essential local knowledge, and policy makers balance competing priorities. Combining these strengths leads to more effective and resilient management of plant invasions. This highlights the central importance of collaboration among people, including Indigenous peoples and other local communities, in decision-making and management. Best practices for developing partnerships between individual researchers and local and Indigenous communities, practitioners, and policy makers include engaging respectfully across knowledge and value systems, testing assumptions with data, considering ecological significance, and connecting across spatial scales. Structural solutions to overcome institutional and implementation barriers and develop effective partnerships include funding knowledge brokers and liaisons, collaboratively reviewing policies and practices, incentivizing long-term relationships and goals, and codeveloping data collection and storage. The resulting intentional, long-term partnerships will enable direct application of ecological knowledge to plant invasions and their management, support sustainable and locally backed solutions, and overcome lags in applying science to practice.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesIntroduced SpeciesClimate Changeadaptive managementcambio globalcommunity‐based conservationconservación comunitariaconservation planningespecie exótica invasoraglobal changeIndigenous peoplesinterfaz ciencia‐políticainvasive exotic speciesmanejo adaptativoplaneación de la conservaciónpolítica y políticas públicaspolitics and policypueblos indígenasscience–policy interface

Identifiers

PMID41318359
PMCPMC12856823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.