ArticleTalanta2026
3-D printed aseptic injection system for capillary electrophoresis.
Article in Talanta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is a powerful tool to separate complex mixtures which includes mixtures of intact and viable organisms, a promising new area to improve analysis of microbiomes. CE requires an injection block or autosampler to load samples for separation. Neither of these sample introduction systems offer ease-of-use and cost efficiency with aseptic injection for analysis of microbiota. We developed a manual injection block to facilitate sterile analysis of organisms via CE. The system replaces traditional clamped blocks with an internally threaded collar. The capillary and electrode are recessed within the collar, preventing external contamination while preserving means to sterilize between analyses. A cylindrical vial holder is externally threaded and accommodates an autoclavable 200 μL polypropylene tube for sample, background electrolyte, and wash solutions. We evaluated performance of the new injector using capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) on a CE system with laser-induced fluorescence detection of fluorescein and subsequent injection of viable Escherichia coli. Analyses of fluorescence produce a linear response across at least four orders of magnitude for hydrodynamically injected samples with LLOD of 6 pM and electrokinetically injected samples with LLOD of 8 pM. Performance for organismal separations coupled with automated fraction collection was evaluated using a standard laboratory strain of E. coli. We demonstrate four-fold improvement in zone width of E. coli using the new injector. Migration times for E. coli were comparable to previous designs; 133.7 ± 2.8 s and 129.8 ± 2.8 s, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.