ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025
CanID: A Robust and Accurate RNA-seq Expression-based Diagnostic Classification Scheme for Pediatric Malignancies.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainable Community-Wide Model to Enhance Cancer Data Usage and Utility.JCO clinical cancer informaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer subtype classification is critical for precision therapy, and there is a growing trend to augment histopathology testing with omics-based machine learning classifiers. However, analytical challenges remain in pediatric cancer regarding the scope and precision of current classifiers, as well as the evolving subtype standardization. To address these challenges, we constructed Cancer Identification (CanID), a stacked ensemble machine learning classification scheme, using transcriptomic features derived from gene-level RNA sequencing count data as the sole input. CanID was developed primarily from 3203 pediatric cancer samples across 13 solid tumor subtypes and 38 hematologic malignancy subtypes, with subtype labels curated without the use of RNA-seq data. The accuracies of independent testing in three independent or external datasets for solid tumors and hematologic malignancies were 99% and 92%-93%, respectively. Notably, CanID was able to classify subtypes challenging for clinical histology evaluation and was robust to both biological and technical challenges, including differences in data collection protocols, class imbalance, potential mislabeled training samples, and classes unobserved during training. The high accuracy, robustness, and biological interpretability of this transcriptome-based classification scheme represent a valuable approach to advance tumor diagnosis and clinically meaningful stratification of tumor types. CanID can be accessed on GitHub at https://github.com/chenlab-sj/CanID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.