ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026
Decoding UTROSCT heterogeneity: systematic clinicopathological evaluation combined with molecular profiling.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BAF complex-independent gene activation by SS18::SSX.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor (UTROSCT) constitutes an exceptionally rare histological subset of uterine mesenchymal neoplasms. While most cases have benign clinical behavior, a subset of UTROSCTs exhibits clinically aggressive behavior characterized by recurrence and metastasis. Here, we present a cohort of 25 UTROSCT cases molecularly confirmed by recurrent fusion gene detection, including ESR1::NCOA3 (n = 12), GREB1::NCOA1 (n = 6), ESR1::NCOA2 (n = 3), GREB1::NCOA2 (n = 2), GREB1::SS18 (n = 1), and GREB1::CTNNB1 (n = 1). Notably, six cases (6/25, 24%) demonstrated recurrence/metastasis: two cases showed intrauterine recurrence (harboring ESR1::NCOA3 and GREB1::NCOA1 fusions), while four developed extrauterine metastases (carrying ESR1::NCOA3, ESR1::NCOA2, GREB1::NCOA1, and GREB1::NCOA2 fusions), with one fatality. To dissect the biological basis of UTROSCT aggressiveness, we performed integrated clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular profiling. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size >5 cm, FIGO stage IB, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as independent predictors of recurrence/metastasis, whereas histologic features, proliferation index, and fusion gene subtypes lacked prognostic significance. Multi-omics analysis of primary versus metastatic tumors revealed striking copy number variations (CNVs) exclusively in metastatic lesions. Specifically, heterozygous losses of SMARCB1 (2/4 metastatic cases) and ATRX (1/4 metastatic cases) were identified; both play critical roles in chromatin remodeling. These genetic alterations were conspicuously absent in primary tumors, suggesting their potential role in metastatic progression. Our findings represent the first demonstration of CNV-driven oncogenic evolution in UTROSCTs, particularly implicating SWI/SNF complex dysregulation in metastatic competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.