Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41317298›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

The Urethral Hanging Theory: A Unified Biomechanical Model for the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence.

Bo S Bergström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bo S BergströmYears from 1988 to 2000, chief of the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mora Hospital, Lasarettsvägen 35, 792 51, Mora, Sweden. bbrgstrm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1593-7811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe pathophysiology of female urinary incontinence (UI) is often considered complex and poorly understood, partly due to the limitations of prevailing theories such as the integral theory and the hammock theory, both of which contradict established physical laws. This article introduces the urethral hanging theory (UHT) as a unified biomechanical model that explains stress urinary incontinence (SUI), mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), and idiopathic urge urinary incontinence (UUI) as a continuum of funneling-related pathologies.

methodsAnatomical analysis, physical principles, published work by others, clinical experience, and mental simulations were used to develop the model. The UHT attributes symptoms to differential mobility-a mechanical imbalance-between the urethra and the bladder neck, resulting in varying degrees of funneling during physical strain.

resultsThe theory provides a physically consistent framework that explains symptom variation across different types of UI and unifies them with a single biomechanical continuum. This framework also offers guidance for individualized surgical interventions.

conclusionIf validated clinically, the UHT could substantially improve diagnostic precision and treatment outcomes for female urinary incontinence.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalUrethraUrinary IncontinenceBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansUrinary BladderDifferential descentDifferential mobilityFemale urinary incontinenceFunnelingPathophysiologyPhysical laws

Identifiers

PMID41317298
PMCPMC13385080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.