ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Triticeal cartilage in forensic anthropological investigations: sex and stature estimation with a machine learning approach.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in forensic science: a systematic review. Part I: personal identification.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sex and stature estimation are critical components in determining the biological profile in forensic anthropology. This study aimed to estimate sex and stature using machine learning (ML) algorithms based on the morphometric data of the triticeal cartilage (TrC) obtained from autopsied cases. A prospective examination of the TrC was conducted on 137 autopsied cases (72 male, 65 female), aged between 18 and 90 years, at the Tokat Forensic Medicine Institution. A total of 209 TrC samples, located on the right and left sides of the neck, were measured for length, width, depth, and weight. Additionally, the cases were categorized into three groups based on stature (< 164 cm, 164-176 cm, and > 176 cm) for further analysis. These measurements were used as input features in ML models to predict sex and stature. As a result of the ML input of the obtained measurements, the highest accuracy rate of 97% was obtained with the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithm for sex estimation. The accuracy rates of other algorithms ranged between 91% and 96%. Regarding stature, the highest accuracy rate was 90% with the Random Forest (RF) algorithm. The accuracy rates of the other algorithms were found to vary between 82% and 89%. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis applied to MLP and RF algorithms showed that the TrC length parameter had the highest effect on sex and stature prediction, respectively. The results of our study showed that TrC has high accuracy and precision in sex and stature prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41317292What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.