Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41317291›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

Prospect of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for cancer.

Akilandeswari P, Pradeep Bv

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akilandeswari PDepartment of Microbiology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, 641 021, Tamil Nadu, India. akilamicrobio@gmail.com.
Pradeep BvDepartment of Microbiology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, 641 021, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive cell transfer (ACT), a fast and promising new advance in immunotherapy for cancer treatment is the chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with the purpose of programming the immune system to attack tumors. Engineered CAR receptors have developed over time depending on the composition of the four generations in the chimeric antigen receptors. Sufficient interleukin-2 (IL-2) is not generated by CAR-T cells in the first generation to exterminate the cancer cells. The next generation adds a secondary single domain such as CD28 and the rapid multiplication of T cells, secretion of cytokine, and immunity to apoptosis. The production of cytokine and killing capability was enhanced by CD3ζ-CD28-41BB or CD3ζ-CD28-OX40 in the third generation, and finally in the fourth generation, the chimeric antigen receptors are known to be T cells that direct for common cytokine-mediated killing that is caused by the addition of interleukin-2 to eradicate cancer cells. Onsets of resistant activation, such as cytokine release syndrome, neurological toxicity, and on-target/off-target recognition, are the difficulties in CAR T cells. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the successes of this chimeric antigen receptor T cell treatment for hematologic tumors. Moreover, the United States and China are the pioneers in the growth of CAR-T cell therapy. Remarkable results by combination therapies have been created by the clinical trials. To improve T cell efficiency, there is the need to adopt new strategies for various solid tumors to aim at tumor profiles and to minimize toxicity of CAR-T cells.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenChimeric antigen receptorClinical trialsCombination therapyPioneersSolid tumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.