ArticleScience China. Life sciences2026
Regurgitation of locusts dedicates chemical defense against predators.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regurgitation in insects is generally regarded as having digestive and defensive functions. Despite a significant aversion of locust regurgitation to some predators, the defensive mechanisms against predators remain unclear. Herein, we employ the locust-ant as a prey-predator system to investigate the defensive mechanism of locust regurgitation by behavioral bioassays, chemical analyses, and electrophysiological experiments. We found that locusts can use their regurgitation in response to a wide range of predators, including fire ants, mantises, and sparrows. Locust regurgitation is mainly secreted from the crop and salivary glands (SG). The colony and individual foraging behavior of ants demonstrated that locust regurgitation and mealworms smeared with the regurgitation significantly repelled the ants' attack. A combination of chemical analysis and behavior assays confirmed that small-molecule compounds, rather than proteins in locust regurgitation, exerted the defensive effect. Among the 907 compounds in the regurgitation, only the mixture of diethyl glutarate (DG) from the SG and 3-methylindole (3MI) and 2-(formylamino)benzoic acid (FBA) from the crop can deter predation of the ants. Furthermore, the mixture of three compounds mediates defense and aversion by stimulating ant gustation based on electrophysiological trials. Our findings reveal molecular evidence of locust regurgitation for chemical defense, offering a pivotal compound combination mediating the interactions in prey-predator systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41317267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.