ArticleBehavior genetics2025
Who is Willing to Participate in Genetic Research? Exploring Barriers and Predictors.
Article in Behavior genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral Genetics as a Public Science: Introduction to the Special Issue.Behavior genetics · 2026Article
- Perceptions of and willingness to participate in genomics research among a U.S. sample.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of racial and ethnic diversity in samples used within the field of human genetics research has been well-documented. However, factors driving the under-representation of individuals who are not of European ancestry remains under-explored. The present study aimed to investigate whether willingness to participate in genetic research differed by race and ethnicity, as well as other demographic (e.g., age, gender, religion affiliation, education level) and psychological or individual factors (e.g., trust in research, knowledge of genetics, trait-level worry, health anxiety, altruism, health status) in two ethnically- and racially-diverse samples (N = 2000 via Prolific and N = 264 via an undergraduate psychology research pool). Participants indicated the types of research they would be willing to participate in, including providing saliva or blood samples for genetic research. Approximately, one third of participants endorsed willingness to provide a saliva sample, whereas one quarter endorsed willingness to provide a blood sample. Demographic factors associated with lower willingness included non-white racial/ethnic identities and lower income. Odds did not differ by age or gender identity. Mistrust of research was consistently associated with lower odds of providing a biological sample, whereas higher health anxiety, altruism, and the experience of a health condition was associated with higher odds of participation. Reasons for reluctance were explored, including the influence of compensation, additional information, opportunity for feedback, and study topic. Findings suggest that increasing transparency about how biological samples can be used, involving community leaders, and providing equitable compensation may increase engagement in genetic research, particularly among historically marginalized populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41317254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.