ArticleGeroScience2026
Visual cortical responses in age-related hearing loss show evidence for compensatory neuroplasticity.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory integration, postural stability, and quality of life: a multidimensional assessment in adult hearing aid users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Cross-modal neuroplasticity in partial hearing loss: a mini-review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory loss is prevalent in older adults and is associated with changes to brain structure and function. In early life, the brain compensates for sensory loss by upregulating intact senses, such as in deafness where neural sensitivity for vision increases and visual peripheral perception improves. However, it is unclear if similar neuroplastic compensation occurs in older adults with sensory loss, which would show the aging brain's adaptability and inform sensory rehabilitation strategies. We tested for evidence of compensatory visual neuroplasticity in adults (N = 66) aged 53 to 80 with typical hearing or hearing loss, and if this neuroplasticity differed for visual stimuli that were or were not relevant to speech perception. Participants viewed speech-like or non-speech stimuli as we recorded cortical activity with the 64-channel electroencephalogram (EEG). Participants with more hearing loss tended to have longer cortical P1 and N1 latencies in the visual evoked potential. However, the later cortical P2 response latency decreased with more hearing loss in agreement with compensatory plasticity. Effects were independent of numerical age. Latency effects in hearing loss were more pronounced for the speech-like stimulus compared to the non-speech stimulus, but P2 responses for the non-speech stimulus showed greater cross-modal recruitment of the temporal cortex. Findings show for the first time that compensatory plasticity operates on later cortical P2 responses in older adults, is not explained by numerical age, and differs for speech and non-speech events. However, P1 and N1 responses in networks coding for visual speech may be sensitive to sensory decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.