ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Continuous autonomic system monitoring during neurosurgical procedures -proof of concept.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The perioperative brain-heart-immune axis: autonomic resilience, multimodal monitoring and postoperative delirium.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetative reactions are common during neurosurgical procedures. Known effects are mainly cardiovascular, including tachy- and bradyarrhythmia, hyper- and hypotonia as well as cardiac arrest. Computer-assisted real-time analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), baroreflex-sensitivity (BRS) allows for continuous evaluation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). We analyzed ANS parameters during intracranial neurosurgical procedures. In this pilot study, we aim to provide proof-of-concept that ANS monitoring during surgery is feasible and yields stable results.We included 129 consecutive patients undergoing neurosurgery for intracranial pathologies over a period of four months. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were continuously monitored during routine anesthesiology care. Data were recorded via ICM + software. HRV, BRS and other vegetative parameters were calculated continuously. Intraoperative events such as hypo-/hypertonia or brady-/tachycardia were monitored.Mean age was 47.2 ± 17.7 years. Of all patients, 54.3% were male (n = 70). For every patient, four intraoperative episodes were defined: start of anesthesia until incision - start of incision until craniotomy - craniotomy until end of resection or intracranial manipulation - end phase until skin closure. BRS continuously decreased during cranial surgery, indicating stabilized autonomic function. Furthermore, blood pressure variability was increased during semi-sitting surgery.Autonomic system monitoring during neurosurgical procedures is safe and feasible. Intraoperatively, an increasing sympathetic activity has been observed without clear disctinction between surgical or anesthesiological events as underlying cause. Monitoring results are reproducible and may be of importance for the detection and prevention of intraoperative cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.