Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41317195›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Association between hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Bing Wang, Meng Wang, Huili Xu, Yu Liu, Tengteng Kang, Yang Cao

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bing WangThe First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, 130021, China.
Meng Wang *Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Huili XuXiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, 441000, Hubei, China.
Yu LiuEmergency Medicine Department of the Second Mobile Contingent Hospital of the Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Tengteng KangDepartment of Nursing, Zhoukou Vocational and Technical College, Zhoukou, 466000, China.
Yang Cao *Department of Nursing, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, Jilin, China. caoyang9304@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis meta-analysis seeks to clarify the relationship between hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and the subsequent risk of developing breast cancer.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify relevant studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Statistical analyses were performed using Stata software (version 14.0), with hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test.

resultsA total of 12 studies were included, comprising 9 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies, with publication years ranging from 1988 to 2023, involving 5,868,660 participants, predominantly from the United States. The analysis revealed that both hysterectomy and oophorectomy are associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, lowering the risk by 16% (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.92; I

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that both hysterectomy and oophorectomy are significantly associated with a reduction in breast cancer risk. The effectiveness of bilateral oophorectomy appears to be modulated by hormone therapy and menopausal status. Further research is needed to clarify these associations and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHysterectomyOvariectomyCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansRisk FactorsBreast cancerHysterectomyMeta-analysisOophorectomyRisk

Identifiers

PMID41317195
PMCPMC12705852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.