ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Adaptation and validation of a collaborative robotic equipment applied to pediatric neurosurgery.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe first robotic surgery in history took place in 1987 using the PUMA 200 robotic arm. Since then, several devices have been developed, but widespread availability is still hindered by their high cost, especially in public funded hospitals.
objectiveConception and validation of a collaborative robotic equipment for the neurosurgical treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy.
methodsThis is a methodological study in which an industrial equipment was adapted and validated for neurosurgical application. Realistic tests and simulations were performed on complex, patient-specific, three-dimensional models, both in the laboratory and in the surgical environment. Such validation followed the criteria established by the FDA manual for certification of medical devices.
resultsPrecision tests analyzed the accuracy between the programmed and executed data, resulting in a mean error at the entry point of 2.21 mm and a target error of 4.41 mm. DISCUSSION: Comparative studies have pointed out the advantages of robotic over conventional surgeries, such as lower risk of bleeding, reduced surgical time, faster recovery, and excellent precision. Nevertheless, commercial challenges remain, mostly related to the high costs of software, hardware, and maintenance of currently used robots. The device described herein could be an affordable option.
conclusionThe KUKA IIWA SERIES® robot was adapted after successful simulations in the laboratory and operation room. The equipment was successfully tested, with trajectory errors within an acceptable margin, thus becoming a viable addition to enhance surgical precision. Future steps include approval by the respective government agency and further application in real operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41317191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.