ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Outcomes of locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic distal femur fractures after TKA.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe investigated outcomes of patients treated with either locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing (IMN) at a single institution and compared outcomes of retrograde IMN to locked plating for periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
methodsWe reviewed 241 subjects with distal femur fractures around total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated with locked plating (197) or retrograde IMN (44). Mean age was 77 years, 78% were female, and mean BMI was 32 kg/m
resultsOverall nonunion rate was 10% and 5-year survivorship free of any revision was 81%, with the most common reasons being nonunion (49%), infection (19%), and aseptic TKA loosening (11%). Patients with prior TKA infection (HR 3; p = 0.02), revision TKA (HR 2; p = 0.03), Su III fractures (HR 2.5; p = 0.04) were at increased risk of revision. There was a trend toward higher non-union rate in the locked plating group (11% vs. 2%; p = 0.07). Those with locked plating had higher rates of osteoporosis (70% vs. 52%; p = 0.02), prior revision TKA (16% vs. 2%; p = 0.02), and Su Type III fractures (36% vs.16%, p = 0.047). Five-year survivorship free of any revision for locked plating and retrograde IMN were 80% and 84%, respectively, with no significant difference in revision, reoperation, or non-operative complications.
conclusionsBoth locked plating and retrograde IMN are viable fixation options for periprosthetic distal femur fractures after TKA. Those treated with locked plating had higher rates of osteoporosis, prior revision TKA, and more distal fractures, but did not demonstrate a significant increased risk for reoperation or revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective comparative cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41317180What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.