Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41317158›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2025

Movement Behaviors and the Role of Self-Reported Symptoms and Well-Being: A Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling Approach Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Sabina Ulbricht, Antje Ullrich, Christina Grosse-Thie, Daniel Strueder, Markus Blaurock, Chia-Jung Busch, Christian Junghanss, Sabine Felser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabina UlbrichtDepartment SHIP-KEF, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Antje UllrichDepartment SHIP-KEF, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3905-858X
Christina Grosse-ThieDepartment of Medicine Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Daniel StruederDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Markus BlaurockDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Chia-Jung BuschDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8254-8237
Christian JunghanssDepartment of Medicine Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Sabine FelserDepartment of Medicine Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4882-0468

Funding

Northern German Universities Association VNU Impulse #60
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to identify individual variability in day-to-day physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) as well as effects of pain, fatigue, and well-being among patients with head and neck cancer (pwHNC) on both movement behaviors.

methodsA total of 52 pwHNC (age ≥ 18 years, participation rate 73.2%) consented to wear an accelerometer during waking hours for seven consecutive days and to answer questionnaires. Applying a predefined accelerometer protocol resulted in a final analysis sample of 41 pwHNC. A dynamic structural equation modeling approach (DSEM) was employed that combines time series modeling and multilevel modeling. At the within-person level, autoregressive and bidirectional relationships between PA and SB were analyzed. At the between-person level, moderator effects of pain, fatigue, and well-being on these relationships were analyzed.

resultsA proportion of 87.8% among the pwHNC were men, mean age 65.8 years, and 72.2% had finished curative care. The average accelerometer wear time was 710.2 ± 153.1 min/d. Of this time, an average of 461.3 ± 151.0 min/d was spent in SB and 248.9 ± 121.6 min/d in PA. At the within-person level, PA and SB data showed no significant autoregressive relationships; that is, previous PA (or SB) did not predict PA (or SB) on the next day, respectively. No bidirectional relationships were found between PA and SB; that is, previous PA did not predict the next-day SB and vice versa. At the between-person level, neither fatigue, pain nor well-being significantly changed the slope and path parameters of PA and SB.

conclusionThis study serves as an example of how DSEM can be used to examine how different movement behaviors interact with each other. Presumably, there is a need for more long-term assessment for the detection of consistency in the temporal information of movement behaviors in pwHNC.

trial registrationGerman Registry of Clinical Trials (DRKS00028062).

Indexed as

ExerciseFatigueHead and Neck NeoplasmsSedentary BehaviorAccelerometryAdultAgedCancer PainFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedPainQuality of LifeSelf Reportaccelerometrybidirectionality modelingdynamic structural equationhead and neck cancerphysical activitysedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID41317158
PMCPMC12664338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.