ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
"I don't grieve as much as I used to": A qualitative study on parents of children with rare and undiagnosed conditions navigating grief in the context of uncertainty.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "If I go down, if I crumble, then everybody does" - identity crisis and emotional strain in parents of children with rare and undiagnosed conditions: a qualitative study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Stress in Families of Individuals with Illness or Disability: A Qualitative Study Based on Family System Unit Stress Theory.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "I don't grieve as much as I used to": A qualitative study on parents of children with rare and undiagnosed conditions navigating grief in the context of uncertainty.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this qualitative interview study was to explore the lived experiences of parents, experiencing high anxiety and poorer quality-of-life/family functioning, caring for a child with a rare and undiagnosed condition. Data analysis led to the generation of a substantial corpus of insights focusing on how parents cope with grief amidst the uncertainty surrounding their child's condition. Whereas much is known about grief related to death in pediatric cancer patients, research focusing on grief in the area of rare and undiagnosed conditions is sparse. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 parents of children affected by a rare and undiagnosed condition undergoing whole genome sequencing (WGS) through the Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) in England and Wales. Participants were purposively sampled based on scores to validated psychological measures. We used reflexive thematic analysis, situated within an interpretivist and post-positivist research paradigm, to explore the data. The central organizing concept was named "Navigating Grief In The Context Of Uncertainty." This overarching theme describes how these parents grieve the loss of the envisioned future they held while navigating an unpredictable reality shaped by their child's undiagnosed condition. Our findings also highlight the "potential ongoingness" of grief, although it may change over time. Parents adapt through constructive reframing, seeking meaning and acceptance, and fostering resilience all of which we found to aid in coping. Understanding the grieving process, particularly the role of uncertainty, is essential for improving the clinical support provided to families affected by rare and undiagnosed conditions and for designing future psychological intervention strategies that address parents who grieve the loss of their anticipated family life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.