ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
'Giving and Receiving'-Peer Volunteers' Experiences of Online Perinatal Support: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore peer volunteers' experiences of delivering online support through SMART to at-risk mothers during the perinatal period, to inform future improvements to mobile-health-application (mHealth app) based peer-support interventions.
designDescriptive qualitative research.
methodsThe study was conducted between February 2024 and June 2025 in a tertiary public healthcare institution in Singapore. Twenty peer volunteers were recruited via convenience and snowball sampling and participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsFour themes were identified: (a) Giving and receiving: the inner world of peer volunteers; (b) Navigating relational complexity in digital peer support; (c) Facilitating connection and continuity in digital peer support; and (d) Building better connections through supportive ecosystems.
conclusionPeers reported experiencing reciprocal benefits, such as a sense of fulfilment and achievement, while supporting mothers. Shared experiences and psychosocial vulnerabilities enhanced relatability, reassurance and rapport, which sustained supportive relationships. Challenges encountered by peers highlighted the need for strengthening both intervention design and peer training. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Regular check-ins by programme facilitators, alongside clear information, flexible guidelines and reassurance, can improve peer volunteers' motivation and resilience, thereby ensuring consistent and sustainable support for at-risk mothers. IMPACT: Examined peer volunteers' experiences in providing online perinatal support to mothers with diverse psychosocial vulnerabilities. Peers offered emotional, informational and practical support, while mothers benefited from learning how peers had coped with their psychosocial vulnerabilities. Shared experiences fostered confidence and reassurance among mothers that they, too could overcome similar adversities. Valuable in providing both medically accurate perinatal information and meaningful social support to perinatal mothers. REPORTING
methodThe reporting of the study adheres to the standards outlined in the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Mothers and peer volunteers contributed valuable insights and suggestions that helped in the design of the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.