ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026
Adjustment of Wettability in Biomaterials: Evaluation of the Impact of Red Propolis Fractions on Electrospun Poly(ε-caprolactone).
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adjustment of Wettability in Biomaterials: Evaluation of the Impact of Red Propolis Fractions on Electrospun Poly(ε-caprolactone).Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study demonstrates the modulation of wettability in biomaterials through the incorporation of distinct fractions of red propolis into electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). Chromatographic analysis revealed that the hydroalcoholic extract contains a significantly higher concentration of active compounds, particularly flavonoids, compared to the wax fraction. The electrospinning process yielded fibrous mats with average fiber diameters below 900 nm, maintaining uniform morphology regardless of the type or concentration of the additive, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Wettability assessments, performed via contact angle measurements and swelling tests, indicated that extract-containing samples exhibited increased hydrophilicity, with contact angles below 90° at concentrations of 10% or higher, while wax-containing formulations retained hydrophobic behavior. Cytotoxicity assays confirmed high cell viability across all formulations, indicating the absence of cytotoxic effects. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the incorporation of different red propolis fractions modulates the structural and surface properties of electrospun PCL, supporting their potential for use in the development of customizable biomaterials for applications in tissue engineering and bioactive wound dressings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.