ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Low-dose radiation exposure and health outcomes among healthcare workers: a multi-center prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe long-term effects of chronic low-dose radiation exposure remain a subject of debate, with studies suggesting a range of outcomes from negligible to significant health impacts.
methodsThis multi-center cohort study followed 210 newly hired healthcare workers in radiation-related occupations for 9 years, from January 2015 to December 2023. Health effects were evaluated using Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (rMANOVA). Significant interactions were explored using Bonferroni's post hoc analysis and Bayesian methods. Repeated-measures regression models and Restricted Cubic Splines (RCS) models were employed to further assess the statistical significance and strength of evidence. Sensitivity analyses were performed employing Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to ensure robustness of the results.
resultsThe per-protocol set included 111 subjects after accounting for exclusions and losses to follow-up. The rMANOVA models identified subtle but statistically significant differences across multiple follow-up intervals for various health indices. Parameters with Bayes factors (BF
conclusionsThis pioneering longitudinal cohort study in western China demonstrates that chronic low-dose radiation exposure among healthcare workers can induce subtle yet significant health effects, underscoring the necessity of adhering to the ALARA principle for radiation exposure management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.