Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316480›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025

Pathological response to pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in ER-low vs. ER-zero breast cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort study.

Sanna Steen, Emelie Karlsson, Ida Björnheden, Gunilla Rask, Viktoria Thurfjell, Hampus Nobin, Blanka Kolodziej, Anna Bodén, Annette Bauer, Rickard Einefors and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sanna SteenDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emelie KarlssonDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ida BjörnhedenUnit of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Gunilla RaskDepartment of Pathology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Viktoria ThurfjellDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hampus NobinDepartment of Pathology, Kalmar County Hospital, Region Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden.
Blanka KolodziejDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Region Jönköping County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Anna BodénDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Annette BauerDepartment of Pathology and Cytology Dalarna, County Hospital Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Rickard EineforsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Per NilssonDepartment of Pathology, Växjö Central Hospital, Region Kronoberg, Sweden.
Ioannis ZerdesDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andri PapakonstantinouDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Theodoros FoukakisDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Irma FredrikssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mattias RantalainenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eugenia Colón-CervantesDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anikó KovácsDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Balazs Acs *Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. balazs.acs@ki.se.
Johan Hartman *Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. johan.hartman@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence indicates that estrogen receptor-low (ER-low)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) may more closely resemble ER-negative (ER-zero, < 1%) rather than ER-positive disease in terms of biological and clinicopathological characteristics. In Sweden, ER-low (ER 1–9%) BC is managed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and is thus eligible for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. We aimed to investigate real-world pathological response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in ER-low versus ER-zero BC patients within a Swedish population-based multi-center cohort.

methodsBC patients with indication to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in Sweden between 2022 and 2024 were included in the study. Clinicopathological data—including pathological complete response (pCR) status, residual cancer burden (RCB) score, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) levels, and routine tumor characteristics—were retrieved from laboratory information systems. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-squared (χ2) tests and associations between continuous variables and ER status or pCR were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test.

resultsThe total cohort comprised 441 TNBC cases (ER-zero n = 398; ER-low n = 43). In the ER-zero group, the pCR rate and RCB score 0–1 were 50.5% (95% CI: 45.5% to 55.5%) and 60.8% (95% CI: 55.8% to 65.6%), respectively. In the ER-low group, the corresponding values were 58.1% (95% CI: 42.1% to 73%), and 60.5% (95% CI: 44.4% to 75%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in either pCR rate (p = 0.46) or dichotomized RCB score (p = 0.88) between the groups. The ER-low group showed significantly higher sTILs percentage compared to the ER-zero group (median sTILs 25% versus 20%, p = 0.046). However, when sTILs were analyzed as a binary categorical variable using a 30% cut-off, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.33).

conclusionsWe observed no significant difference in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab between ER-zero and ER-low BCs. These findings support previous evidence suggesting that ER-low tumors behave more similarly to ER-zero than ER-positive.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyReceptors, EstrogenTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespembrolizumabReceptors, EstrogenER lowNeoadjuvant immunotherapyPembrolizumabTriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID41316480
PMCPMC12670802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.