Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316419›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis achieves sufficient precision for femoral implants in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Frank-David Øhrn, Lars H W Engseth, Are H Pripp, Tommy Frøseth Aae, Anselm Schulz, Otto Schnell Husby, Stephan M Röhrl

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Precision, Accuracy, and Observer Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Radiostereometric Analysis in Measuring Femoral Stem Migration In Vitro.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frank-David ØhrnNordmøre and Romsdal Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Opdølvegen 4, 6450, Hjelset, Norway. frank-david.ohrn@helse-mr.no.
Lars H W EngsethDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Are H PrippOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tommy Frøseth AaeNordmøre and Romsdal Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Opdølvegen 4, 6450, Hjelset, Norway.
Anselm SchulzFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Otto Schnell HusbyNordmøre and Romsdal Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Opdølvegen 4, 6450, Hjelset, Norway.
Stephan M RöhrlDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional radiostereometric analysis (RSA) has been used for several decades to assess implant migration in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). More recently, computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) has been introduced as an alternative. Experimental studies have demonstrated acceptable precision for CT-RSA; however, this has not yet been validated in a clinical setting. With the emergence of new alignment philosophies in TKA, migration analysis of femoral components has become increasingly important. A key criticism of CT-RSA has been the higher radiation doses compared with conventional RSA, particularly in longitudinal studies involving repeated CT scans. In this study, we evaluated the precision of CT-RSA for assessing femoral component migration in two TKA designs at two different radiation dose levels. We hypothesized that there would be no clinically relevant difference in precision between the two radiation dose levels.

methodsWe performed a randomized controlled trial of 50 patients using Tritanium and GMK Sphere 3D Metal implants and analysed the precision of the method through double examinations expressed as means with 95% confidence intervals at standard and low-dose levels. The main outcome variable was the difference in mean maximum total point motion. We set the clinical meaningful difference to be more than 0.1 mm based on existing literature. Secondary outcome variables were the means and standard deviations of the translation and rotation of the implants.

findingsWe found a precision of (mean, standard deviation) 0.20 (0.08) and 0.17 mm (0.06) for standard and low dose respectively, giving a difference (95% confidence interval) of - 0.03 mm (- 0.06-0.00). P-value was 0.031. Variability ratios were 0.009 for the standard deviation test.

interpretationIn this first clinical study to assess the precision of computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis for femoral implants in total knee arthroplasty, we found no clinically relevant difference in precision. Our findings confirm that CT-RSA provides sufficient precision in a clinical setting to enable migration analysis of femoral implants in total knee arthroplasty, even when using very low radiation doses.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemurKnee ProsthesisRadiostereometric AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureCT-RSAFemoral implantsRadiation doseRadiostereometric analysisRSATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41316419
PMCPMC12661738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.