ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Incidence of Lyme borreliosis following Ixodes ricinus tick bites in Poland: a citizen science approach.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of developing Lyme borreliosis (LB) following a tick bite is influenced by several independent factors, including the promptness of tick removal, host immune response, and regional variability in pathogen prevalence. This study employed a citizen science approach to investigate the incidence of LB following Ixodes ricinus bites in Poland and to assess the relationship between Borrelia spirochete load, tick attachment duration, and subsequent LB development in humans.
methodsThe study was conducted over 2 years (2021-2022). Participants were instructed to submit removed ticks and to complete questionnaires at enrollment and 8 weeks post-bite. All LB cases were physician-confirmed on the basis of national clinical criteria. Tick attachment duration was estimated using scutal and coxal indices. Genomic DNA extracted from ticks was subjected to molecular screening for Borrelia spp., and spirochete load was quantified using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
resultsThe prevalence of Borrelia infection in I. ricinus ticks was 15.7% (n = 2079). The overall risk of developing LB following a tick bite was 3.1% (n = 1757). Among confirmed LB cases (n = 54), erythema migrans was reported in 64.9%. In cases involving Borrelia-positive ticks (n = 250), the risk of LB increased with attachment duration-from 10.0% for ticks removed within 24 h to 30.0% for those removed after 48 h. Among Borrelia-infected ticks removed from the skin of the patients with LB, Borrelia afzelii was the most frequently detected species, however co-infection with Borrelia miyamotoi was also observed. Notably, both Borrelia prevalence and spirochete load in ticks decreased significantly with prolonged attachment duration.
conclusionsThe overall risk of LB following an I. ricinus bite was relatively low. While B. afzelii was the dominant species detected, the potential risk posed by B. miyamotoi warrants attention, given its significantly higher spirochete load compared with the B. burgdorferi sensu lato complex, potentially indicating greater transmission efficiency. The observed decline in spirochete load with increasing attachment time suggests a complex dynamic that may influence transmission risk, meriting further investigation. This study highlights the utility of citizen science as a viable method for collecting large-scale data on human-tick encounters, despite methodological constraints inherent in volunteer-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.