Observational studyJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) Questionnaire.
Observational study in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Persian version of the 4-Domain Sports PROM questionnaire.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatellar tendinopathy symptoms and functional limitations should be evaluated using validated, language-specific assessment tools. Cultural adaptation of these tools can improve their psychometric properties across languages. The VISA-P questionnaire is the only condition-specific tool for measuring symptom severity, but a validated Persian version is not available. PURPOSE: To translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the VISA-P questionnaire for use among Persian-speaking athletes. STUDY
designCase-control observational study with a test-retest subgroup; Level of evidence, 3.
methodsThe VISA-P was translated into Persian following international guidelines: forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pretesting, and validation. Sixty Persian-speaking athletes (30 with patellar tendinopathy, 30 healthy controls) participated in this cross-sectional study. Psychometric evaluation followed COSMIN standards assessing structural validity (exploratory factor analysis), construct validity (Spearman correlation with the Blazina classification), known-groups validity (comparison between symptomatic and healthy athletes using the Mann-Whitney U test)), internal consistency (Cronbach's α), and test-retest reliability (ICC over 24-48 h). Face validity, feasibility, and interpretability were also assessed.
resultsThe VISA-P-Pr demonstrated good face and content validity. Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure explaining 87.1% of variance with strong item loadings. Construct validity was supported by a strong negative correlation with the Blazina classification (r
conclusionThe VISA-P-Pr is a reliable and valid instrument with psychometric properties comparable to the original VISA-P, suitable for clinical and research use among Persian-speaking athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.