Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316390›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2025

Evaluation of short-course durvalumab combined with dose-dense EC in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced luminal B/HER2(-) or triple-negative breast cancer.

Alix Devaux, Gabriela Beniuga, Paul Delrée, Claire Quaghebeur, Stephanie Henry, Mieke Van Bockstal, Christine Galant, Sarah Lefevre, Dominique Korman, Vincent Verschaeve and 16 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Alix DevauxOncology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Rue du Campus des Viviers 1, Gilly, 6060, Charleroi, Belgium.
Gabriela BeniugaInstitut de Pathologie et Génétique, Gosselies, Belgium.
Paul DelréeInstitut de Pathologie et Génétique, Gosselies, Belgium.
Claire QuaghebeurOncology Unit of CHU UCL Namur, Sainte-Elisabeth Site, Namur, Belgium.
Stephanie HenryOncology Unit of CHU UCL Namur, Sainte-Elisabeth Site, Namur, Belgium.
Mieke Van BockstalDepartment of Anatomopathology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Christine GalantDepartment of Anatomopathology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Sarah LefevreOncology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Rue du Campus des Viviers 1, Gilly, 6060, Charleroi, Belgium.
Dominique KormanOncology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Rue du Campus des Viviers 1, Gilly, 6060, Charleroi, Belgium.
Vincent VerschaeveOncology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Rue du Campus des Viviers 1, Gilly, 6060, Charleroi, Belgium.
Christophe LonchayOncology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Rue du Campus des Viviers 1, Gilly, 6060, Charleroi, Belgium.
Lionel D'HondtOncology Unit of CHU UCL Namur, Godinne Site, Yvoir, Belgium.
Martine BerlièreGynecology Unit of Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Cédric van MarckeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, and Pole of Medical Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Sophie DelmarcellePharmacology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
Jean-Michel MineGynecology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
Gebhard MüllerInstitut de Pathologie et Génétique, Gosselies, Belgium.
Nathalie MyantInstitut de Pathologie et Génétique, Gosselies, Belgium.
Isabelle BarLaboratory of Translational Oncology, Institut de Pathologie et Génétique / Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Gosselies, Belgium.
Sandy HaussyLaboratory of Translational Oncology, Institut de Pathologie et Génétique / Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Gosselies, Belgium.
Ahmad MerhiInstitut de Pathologie et Génétique, Gosselies, Belgium.
Deborah PetroneLaboratory of Translational Oncology, Institut de Pathologie et Génétique / Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Gosselies, Belgium.
Pierre G CoulieLaboratory of GECE, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Luc CanonOncology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Rue du Campus des Viviers 1, Gilly, 6060, Charleroi, Belgium.
Francois P DuhouxDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, and Pole of Medical Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Javier CarrascoOncology Unit of Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Rue du Campus des Viviers 1, Gilly, 6060, Charleroi, Belgium. javier.carrasco@ghdc.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been the standard of care for stage II and III triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) since 2021. For Luminal B/HER2(-) breast cancers (BC) recent results from randomized phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) when ICI are combined with overall NACT. Emerging real-life data on TNBC reveal rates of ICI-related toxicities higher than expected, raising questions about the possibility of reducing ICI exposure during NACT while maintaining an efficacy advantage. The B-IMMUNE study explored the safety and efficacy of short-course durvalumab combined with EC during NACT in locally advanced BC. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe prospective phase 1b/2 trial included patients with locally advanced Luminal B/HER2(-) or TNBC who were treated with paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly from weeks 1–12, followed by 4 cycles of dose-dense epirubicin 90mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 biweekly (ECdd), in a neoadjuvant setting. Phase 1b evaluated a single infusion of durvalumab 1500mg combined with the 3rd cycle of ECdd and phase 2 evaluated two infusions with the 1st and 3rd cycles of ECdd respectively. The primary endpoints were safety and pathological complete response (pCR) rate versus historical control. Based on Simon’s two-stage design, the trial was considered positive if > 8/20 pCRs were observed among TNBC patients and > 5/22 for luminal B HER2(-) BC patients.

resultsFifty patients were considered for safety analyses and 34% of them experienced grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) and 8% immunity-related AEs. Of the 47 patients treated with durvalumab in phase 2, 46 (22 TNBC and 24 Luminal B/HER2(-) BC) were considered for efficacy analyses. A pCR was observed in 12/22 TNBC patients (55%) and 8/24 Luminal B/HER2(-) BC patients (33%).

conclusionsThe B-IMMUNE study achieved its primary objective by showing that the addition of only 2 doses of durvalumab to NACT seems to improve the pCR rate compared to a historical control without ICI, for both TNBC and Luminal B/HER2(-) BC, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. De-escalation of ICI in the neoadjuvant setting should be further investigated in phase 3 trials.

trial registrationEudraCT: 2016–003998-1 date: 19 January 2017.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedCyclophosphamideEpirubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelPathologic Complete ResponseProspective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalCyclophosphamidedurvalumabEpirubicinERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPaclitaxelDurvalumabImmunotherapyLocally advanced breast cancerNeoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID41316390
PMCPMC12661675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.