ArticleHead & face medicine2025
A deep learning framework for automated dental segmentation and diagnostic report generation from cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for dental caries diagnosis: translating algorithms to clinical practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop a deep learning-based model that is capable of automatically segmenting teeth in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and generating auxiliary diagnostic reports.
methodsA two-stage pipeline model comprising a segmentation module and a classification module was designed. The segmentation module integrates the 3D TransUNet model and fine-tuned nnU-Netv2 framework to predict tooth location and numbering. The classification module uses a 3D DenseNet169 model to assess tooth conditions and detect dental diseases. A total of 450 CBCT datasets were collected, preprocessed, and annotated with tooth contours, numbering, and disease status. The dataset was randomly split into training, validation, and test sets at a 3:1:1 ratio. The model's performance was then evaluated by using multiple quantitative metrics.
resultsThe segmentation module achieved a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.9409 and an average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) of 0.5011. The classification module, which is based on the 3D DenseNet169 model, achieved an accuracy of 0.9297 and an F1-score of 0.9252.
conclusionsThe two-stage pipeline model effectively integrates automated tooth segmentation and auxiliary diagnosis. The segmentation module demonstrates high accuracy, while the classification module exhibits strong diagnostic performance. The final output seamlessly combines segmentation and the diagnostic results, enabling the automated generation of structured auxiliary diagnostic reports with tooth numbering. By significantly enhancing the diagnostic efficiency, the proposed method offers substantial support for clinical decision-making in dentistry and holds great potential for real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.