ReviewBiomarker research2025
Advances in measurable residual disease assessment for acute myeloid leukemia: from cytogenetics and molecular biology to assessment of the methylation pattern and surface-enhanced Raman scattering as emerging technologies.
Review in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presenting a multi-marker response-adapted framework for venetoclax duration in acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Global bibliometric analysis of TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: research hotspots and evolution.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment has become a cornerstone in the management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), offering critical prognostic information and guiding post-remission therapy. Conventional MRD detection methods, including multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative PCR (qPCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have demonstrated strong predictive value but are limited by technical complexity, marker specificity, and accessibility. This review explores the current landscape of MRD monitoring in AML, covering cytogenetic, immunophenotypic, and molecular approaches, with particular emphasis on the strengths and limitations of each. We further examine promising emerging technologies—namely DNA methylation profiling and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)—as non-invasive alternatives. DNA methylation-based assays capitalize on the epigenetic dysregulation characteristic of AML, while proof-of-concept studies indicate SERS as a promising alternative for cancer subtypes, stages or specific mutation detection by analyzing biofluids or extracted DNA from blood. Together, these developments hold the potential to overcome current diagnostic limitations, enabling more universal and precise MRD assessment. Ongoing research and validation will determine their future integration into standard clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.