Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316339›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

Creating an integrated innovation system to enable the adaptation and uptake of health-system innovations in Canada: insights from citizen panels and a national stakeholder dialogue.

Aunima R Bhuiya, Peter DeMaio, Jonathan D Cura, Francois-Pierre Gauvin, Simon Hagens, Paul Hébert, John N Lavis, Josephine McMurray, Kaelan A Moat, Robert J Reid and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Aunima R BhuiyaMcMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Peter DeMaioMcMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Jonathan D CuraMcMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Francois-Pierre GauvinMinistère de La Santé Et Des Services Sociaux, Québec City, Canada.
Simon HagensCanada Health Infoway, Ottawa, Canada.
Paul HébertCanadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Canada.
John N LavisMcMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Josephine McMurrayLazaridis School of Business and Economics/Community Health, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Kaelan A MoatMcMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Robert J ReidTrillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada.
Heidi SveistrupBruyère Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Laura Tamblyn-WattsCanAge, Toronto, Canada.
Michael G WilsonMcMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. wilsom2@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

AGE-WELL NCE Inc AW-PP2020-PP6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth-system leaders are increasingly faced with making decisions about whether and how to use a wide range of current and emerging health-system innovations to address complex system and policy challenges. Health-system innovations can broadly include new ways of doing things at a system level, such as new approaches to govern health systems, care delivery, funding models, health policy or better ways to integrate health and social services. However, Canada has historically struggled with the adaptation and uptake of health-system innovations. This multicomponent study aimed to explore the challenges, approaches and implementation considerations for creating an integrated innovation system that enables the adaptation and uptake of health-system innovations from the perspectives of citizens and health system leaders in Canada.

methodsWe synthesized the best-available evidence into an evidence brief and a subsequent plain-language version (a citizen brief) in consultation with a steering committee and key informants, including policymakers, leaders of systems, organizations and professional organizations, industry representatives, citizen leaders and researchers. These briefs informed deliberations in four citizen panels (n = 48 participants) and a national stakeholder dialogue with health-system leaders (n = 23 participants) to identify key challenges, approaches, implementation considerations and next steps that could be taken.

resultsCitizen panel participants and health-system leaders highlighted barriers such as culture and mindsets that resist health-system innovations, limited targeted funding for health-system innovations and processes that encourage sustainability, lack of mechanisms to adapt health-system innovation in local contexts and limited health human resources due to competing interests across health systems. Both groups emphasized the need for people-centred approaches to establish shared goals and vision, identify gaps and map what has worked to drive health-system innovations, set priorities and discuss how each stakeholder group can contribute to building and reviewing implementation considerations such as resources and funding related for the adaptation and uptake of health-system innovations.

conclusionsThe findings provide insight for ongoing efforts to improve the development, implementation and evaluation efforts to enhance and harness health-system innovation to strengthen health systems in Canada. Collaboration from within and between governments and sectors will ultimately help to increase the value gained from health-system innovations.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationDelivery of Health CareDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiffusion of InnovationHealth PolicyOrganizational InnovationStakeholder ParticipationCanadaHumansLeadershipPolicy MakingCitizen engagementHealth systemsInnovationStakeholder dialogue

Identifiers

PMID41316339
PMCPMC12763929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.