ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2025
The impact of transportation on wounds up to 4 cm on umbilical outpouchings of slaughter pigs.
Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Denmark, pigs with wounds on umbilical outpouchings (UO) are deemed unfit for transport, due to welfare concerns, particularly the risk of wound rupture when these pigs are transported. Consequently, these pigs are often killed on-farm thereby affecting sustainability of pork production and farmers' economy. To gain more knowledge on the impact of transportation on wounds on UOs of pigs, this study examined 96 Danish slaughter pigs with wounds on the UOs and investigated how clinical signs were associated with the distance between the wound surface and the cavity of the UOs measured at necropsy. The pigs originated from three conventional herds and were clinically examined by the herd veterinarian the day before transport to the abattoir. From the abattoir, the UOs were sent for pathological examination at University of Copenhagen where the distance between the wound surface and the peritoneal lining of the cavity of the UOs was measured.
resultsThe results showed that the maximum measurement of either the length or width of the wound measured clinically was 2.93 cm (σ = 0.97). The mean distance between the wound surface and the cavity of the UOs of 87 slaughter pigs was 2.27 cm, and a total of 94% had a distance of at least 1 cm. For one pig there was access from the UO wound to the UO cavity. The association between size of the wound and the distance between the wound surface and the UO cavity, depended on the shape of the UO. If the UO was elongated in shape no significant association was found, however, if the UO was spherical in shape the distance became significantly shorter as the wound became larger. The study also investigated if the wounds on the UOs changed in size when measured before and after transport to the abattoir. Wound size measured clinically and at necropsy showed a correlation of 0.51, indicating a moderate correlation. When comparing the wound sizes clinically and just after individual slaughter the correlation was 0.7 indicating a moderate to strong correlation. With a ± 10% difference from the baseline, a total of 28 wounds measured larger at the abattoir compared to the clinical examination.
conclusionsThis study found that 94% of the wounds on UOs of 87 slaughter pigs examined post mortem had a distance of at least 1 cm from the wound surface to the UO cavity. In one pig the wound had ruptured giving access from the UO wound to the UO cavity. While a number of other factors also need to be considered when evaluating fitness for transport, the results from this study may serve as part of a risk assessment for transporting slaughter pigs with wounds on UOs in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.