Observational studyAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Dynamic associations of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine with cognitive trajectories in individuals with Alzheimer's or mixed dementia: a real-world analysis using the quality registry SveDem.
Observational study in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) and mixed dementia (MxD) represent major public health concerns, yet there is limited real-world evidence on the long-term associations of commonly prescribed pharmacological treatments, particularly cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and their combination with memantine. This study aims to evaluate the long-term, time-varying associations of ChEIs and memantine on cognitive decline in a large, nationwide cohort of individuals diagnosed with AD or MxD.
methodsThis observational study utilized data from the Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders (SveDem), analyzing 32,282 individuals diagnosed with AD or MxD between 2007 and 2022. Patients were followed for up to 11 years to track treatment patterns and cognitive trajectories. Initiation of ChEIs (donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine) or memantine within six months after an AD or MxD diagnosis and then the time-varying medications (ChEIs alone, memantine alone or memantine added on to ChEIs) within six months after each follow-up were analyzed. Linear mixed-effects model was used to assess cognitive decline measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score trajectories.
resultsOf the 32,282 participants (mean age 78.4 years; 61% women), 78.4% initiated treatment with ChEIs alone, and 21.6% with memantine alone. Over time, prescription patterns shifted from monotherapy to combination therapy, with donepezil and galantamine more likely to achieve 1 Defined Daily Dosages (DDD) than rivastigmine users. Memantine alone users experienced a yearly cognitive decline of 1.79 MMSE points (95% CI: −1.85, −1.73). Compared with memantine users, patients on ChEIs alone declined 0.65 points less per year (95% CI: −0.59, −0.72), while those on combination therapy declined 0.19 points less per year (95% CI: −0.10, −0.28). Among ChEIs, donepezil users experienced an annual decline of 1.02 points (95% CI: −1.06, −0.98). In comparison, galantamine users declined an additional 0.05 points per year (95% CI: −0.11, 0.01), and rivastigmine users declined an additional 0.17 points per year (95% CI: −0.24, −0.11), relative to donepezil.
conclusionsIn this large cohort of patients with AD or MxD, ChEIs users alone, particularly donepezil and galantamine, showed slower cognitive decline compared to users of memantine or combination therapy users. While differences were modest, the results contribute to a better understanding of treatment trajectories in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.