ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
A model of the cerebellum generates gait adaptations in a reflex-based neuromusculoskeletal model during split-belt walking.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unified comparison of spinal locomotion control architectures in neuromechanical simulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring split-belt treadmill walking, neurotypical humans exhibit adaptations characterized by a gradual decrease in step length asymmetry (SLA) toward or beyond symmetry, whereas individuals with cerebellar damage do not show these motor adaptations. Neuromusculoskeletal simulations may help to better understand individual aspects of the underlying neural control, but are currently incapable of predicting adaptations to the continuous perturbations imposed by split-belt walking.
methodsWe extend a spinal reflex model with a biologically inspired model of the cerebellum, which enables error-based motor adaptation by modulating spinal control parameters in response to mismatches between a continuously updated internal prediction and actual motor outcomes. In this work, the cerebellum modulates only a single spinal control parameter, the timing of swing initiation in each leg, which allows examining its isolated contribution to gait adaptation as all other reflex pathways are held constant. We created 80 s predictive simulations of the model walking on a split-belt treadmill with a 2:1 belt-speed ratio, and compared predicted spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics to the reflex-only model and literature.
resultsThe reflex-only model could walk on the split-belt treadmill, but showed no step length adaptations. In contrast, the extended model adapted SLA from an initial asymmetric value toward symmetry or beyond, following an exponential time course similar to that observed in experiments. The model could adapt at varying rates and converge to different asymmetry levels. We found that, in simulation, SLA adaptation during split-belt walking is possible without changes in reflex gains, by adapting the timing of swing initiation. The modulation of timing alone also predicted the experimentally observed exponential adaptation in the temporal domain, but only a linear change in the spatial domain, indicating that additional control mechanisms are likely required to reproduce the full spatial adaptation observed in split-belt walking.
conclusionWe propose a computational model of the cerebellum which, when integrated into a spinal reflex model, autonomously drives feedforward gait adaptations during split-belt walking. This advances the current state of predictive simulations and may eventually help to better understand specific adaptation processes. The modular framework can be extended to test different hypotheses about motor control and adaptation during continuous perturbation tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.