Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316198›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Fortifying healthcare: exploring organizational resilience in Israeli healthcare organizations - a quasi-longitudinal study.

Tamir Velner, Zohar Rubinstein, Bruria Adini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tamir VelnerEmergency & Disaster Management Department, School of Public Health, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, POB 39040, Tel Aviv, 6139001, Israel. tamir82@icloud.com.
Zohar RubinsteinBaruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel.
Bruria AdiniEmergency & Disaster Management Department, School of Public Health, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, POB 39040, Tel Aviv, 6139001, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth Organizations (HOs) worldwide are vital to any nation's capacity to withstand crises. The heightened focus on organizational resilience (OR) can be largely attributed to the global COVID-19 pandemic. The terror attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, underscored the essential nature of resilience in healthcare settings. By emphasizing OR's components, HOs can enhance their ability to anticipate, respond to, and recover from disruptions. This research hypothesized that the terror attack would serve as a catalyst for enhancing organizational resilience within healthcare organizations. This study aims to compare levels of organizational resilience among healthcare organizations before and after a mega-mass casualty incident and to identify the key predictors of resilience across various healthcare settings.

methodsA quasi-longitudinal study. Three HOs were assessed pre-7.10.23 and six HOs were assessed following this incident, in the midst of an ongoing conflict (two hospitals, two district health bureaus, and two Emergency medical services regions). An organizational resilience assessment tool, developed through literature review, expert validation, pilot testing, and a Delphi process to rank the importance of each category, included 29 items across seven categories. Data were collected anonymously via an online survey and results were analyzed both separately and in aggregate to assess resilience levels.

resultsA total of 1,035 participants completed the survey across three healthcare organization types: general hospitals (N = 345), district health bureaus (N = 300), and emergency medical service regions (N = 390). Organizational resilience (OR) was measured separately for each organization type at two timepoints: before and after the October 7, 2023 events. No statistically significant changes in OR were observed post-event. Multiple linear regression identified six predictors that explained 81.4% of the variance in OR (Adjusted R² = 0.814), with transformational leadership emerging as the strongest predictor.

conclusionsThe study stresses the importance of improving organizational resilience in healthcare organizations facing extreme events. Managers in healthcare organizations should prioritize investment in transformational leadership, technological advancement, and employee well-being to enhance organizational resilience. Due to the differing levels of organizational resilience across disciplines within healthcare organizations, it is recommended to concentrate efforts and resources on sectors with lower resilience levels. This approach will enhance targeted interventions, save resources, and establish an effective timeline for strengthening organizational resilience. By enhancing their resilience, organizations can more effectively manage unforeseen emergencies, mitigate their impact on the overall health system, and contribute to saving lives.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareMass Casualty IncidentsResilience, PsychologicalHumansIsraelLongitudinal StudiesSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTerrorismConflictHealthcare organizationsOrganizational resilience

Identifiers

PMID41316198
PMCPMC12661828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.