Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316191›Full record

Trial reportChiropractic & manual therapies2025

Comfort during side posture lumbopelvic manipulation in a low back pain population-effects of a typical versus modified flexed lumbopelvic position: a crossover randomized control trial.

Simon Wang, Erinn McCreath Frangakis, Martha Funabashi, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon WangCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada. swang@cmcc.ca.
Erinn McCreath FrangakisCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Martha FunabashiCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Sheilah Hogg-JohnsonCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiterature on low back pain (LBP) treatment suggests not all LBP is the same and patients with extension- or flexion-related LBP may benefit from different strategies. This study's objective was to evaluate the effect of participant positioning when delivering spinal manipulation on reported immediate comfort, in individuals with LBP.

methodsThis a randomized crossover trial. Volunteer adult participants with LBP were recruited from a chiropractic college campus clinic to receive two procedures in random order: 1. Standard side posture lumbopelvic manipulation (SPLM) and 2. Modified flexed lumbopelvic manipulation. The modified position was similar to the standard, but with increased hip and lumbopelvic flexion. Participants were not blinded. The primary outcome of self-reported comfort was recorded using a 0-10 scale. Paired t-tests were used to compare mean comfort scores, and a minimal clinically important difference of 2.0 was used. Secondary analysis examined correlations between comfort during active range of motion (AROM) and the two SPLM procedures. An exploratory analysis comparing within-participant differences was examined. All reported harms were mild in nature (e.g. discomfort).

resultsForty participants were recruited (mean 25.5 years of age, 75% female). 20 participants started with the Standard SPLM and 20 started with the Modified Flexed SPLM. No differences in comfort were found between the Standard SPLM (N = 40) versus Modified flexed SPLM (N = 40), (mean (SD) = - 0.01 (2.3), Effect Size Cohen's d = - 0.004 95% CI (- 0.32, 0.32)). No correlations were found between the comfort during AROM and the two SPLM procedures. Observing within-participant differences for individual comfort, 14 participants had a clinically significant difference ≥ 2. Specifically, 6 participants had lower scores with Standard SPLM and 8 participants had lower scores with Modified flexed SPLM.

conclusionComparing comfort during a Modified flexed SPLM to the Standard one revealed no difference for a population with LBP. However, some individuals did demonstrate a comfort preference for a Standard versus a Modified flexed position. Future studies should examine other variations of manipulation and particular subgroups of individuals with LBP (e.g. direction related) that experience discomfort during manipulation.

Indexed as

Low Back PainManipulation, SpinalPatient PositioningPostureAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultDiscomfortLow back painPatient comfortSpinal manipulationSubgroup

Identifiers

PMID41316191
PMCPMC12765281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.