ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Mechanical stress on the rod in posterior spinal fusion with and without rod fracture: a finite element analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRod fracture (RF) is a common complication of posterior spinal fusion surgery, with a high reoperation rate. This study evaluated the mechanical stress on the rods and intervertebral discs under various loading conditions in a simplified short-segment lumbar fusion model (L3-S1) with and without a unilateral rod fracture (URF) via 3D-computed tomography finite element analysis (CT/FEA), to clarify the spinal motion directions most associated with the mechanical stress on the rods.
methodsTwo 3D nonlinear finite element models of L3-S1 posterior spinal fusion were created using the preoperative CT images of 10 patients: (1) a no rod fracture (NRF) model and (2) a URF model with a simulated left RF at L4/5. A 10-Nm load was applied in six directions (flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation), and the maximum von Mises stress on the right rod at L4/5 and the minimum principal stress on the L2/3 adjacent and L4/5 intervertebral discs were measured and compared between both models. Furthermore, the maximum von Mises stress on the right rod was also compared among six loading directions.
resultsMechanical stress on the L4/5 intervertebral disc was significantly higher in the URF model under all loading directions, but there was no significant difference in the mechanical stress on the adjacent L2/3 intervertebral disc between both models. In the NRF model, mechanical stress on the right rod was significantly higher under left and right axial rotational loadings versus the other loading directions. In the URF model, mechanical stress on the right rod was significantly higher under left lateral bending and axial rotational loading versus flexion loading.
conclusionsAfter posterior spinal fusion surgery, restricting spinal axial rotation and lateral bending toward the fractured side may help reduce mechanical stress on the rods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.