SynthesisBMC public health2025
Health and wellbeing experiences of women informal workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Female Scrap Collectors in Qumbu, Eastern Cape, South Africa Through the Lens of Resilience Theory.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLacking social safety nets, women informal workers were adversely affected during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly with their over-representation in hard-hit sectors and poor prospect of alternative employment. Differential needs of women informal workers during the pandemic must be explored to address health inequalities and inform pandemic preparedness. This systematic review aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence on the health and wellbeing experiences of women informal workers during the recent pandemic.
methodsMEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO were systematically searched in November 2024, along with supplementary searches in Google Scholar and WHO COVID-19 research database. Citation tracking of included studies and grey literature search were also performed. Eligible studies explored first-person accounts of women informal workers about their health and wellbeing during the pandemic, and collected data using interviews, focus groups, or observations. Quality assessment of included studies was completed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Drawing from the concept of determinants of health, thematic approach was used to synthesise findings, taking a holistic perspective of health and wellbeing experiences during the pandemic.
resultsFifty-three studies were included, majority conducted in low-and middle-income countries. Studies explored the experiences of women in various forms of informal work including sex workers, domestic workers, traders/vendors and home-based workers. Four themes were generated: (1) exacerbation of existing vulnerabilities; (2) negotiation of risks and resilience; (3) interconnectedness of health and wellbeing stressors; and (4) variable experiences across social locations. Financial strain from livelihood loss was the primary stressor during the pandemic, and through cascading effect impacted other health and wellbeing domains. Stressors experienced were deeply interrelated and shaped by structural determinants - socioeconomic, political and cultural - as well as pandemic response policies. The experiences of women informal workers were mediated by intersecting social identities such as occupation type, caste/class and migration status, which influenced both their vulnerabilities and capacities to respond, resulting in diverse and unequal outcomes.
conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on the health and wellbeing of woman informal workers. In the groundwork for future development and pandemic planning, equity-centred approach informed by intersectionality must be applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.